อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University vs Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
Independent side-by-side analysis from public Google review data.
Trust Score
Quick stats
Google rating★ 4.8vs★ 5.0✓
Total reviews12vs5,229✓
DistrictPathum WanvsPathum Wan
Quality trend→ Stablevs→ Stable
Local Guide reviews8vs28✓
Avg reviewer credibility110✓vs24
StatusOpenvsOpen
Phone✓ listedvs✓ listed
Service strength (mention count)
Facial
010
Botox
08
Filler
04
HIFU
03
Laser
03
Dental
20
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทั Aura Bangkok clinic
Reviewer languages
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University
EN100%
Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
EN99%Other1%
Top mentioned doctor
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University
No doctor-specific data.
Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
Vee
2 mentions·★ 5.0
What reviewers say
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University
Clean facility×3Professional×1Friendly staff×1
Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
Friendly staff×43Professional×39Recommended×34Clean facility×18English-speaking staff×9Affordable×4
Sample reviews
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University
“This is my first time here, and the service is excellent. The staff, students, and doctors are all very polite. The prices are reasonable, the air conditioning is nice and cool, and the area is clean.”
Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
“Such a lovely experience here!! First time doing any non surgical face slimming ever so I was very nervous. All the staff here were very kind, informative and attentive. There were some who spoke grea...”
อาคารสมเด็จย่า คณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาฯ Somdejya93 Building Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University
Aura Bangkok clinic Siam
↗ This is an independent comparison — neither clinic has paid for placement here.
📊 Data sources: Google reviews (Google Maps), Trust Score = our internal algorithm weighing review credibility, recency, language diversity, and Local Guide signals.